Leaders use money to create new societal traumas

In my recent post I argued how trauma influences societal behaviour. In this post I will highlight the effect of trauma on politics and economic decision making.

In my recent post you've read that traumas will cause longterm negative effects, such as fear, resistance to a better society and even causing new traumas. When a society is hurt, it has to deal with the pain and sometimes the society carries that pain for a long time, even more than one generation.

Leadership is based on frequency A person accept a leader based on their aura and frequency. Not even on their words or actions. What a person is taught in their youth as 'safe, reliable and acceptable' frequency and aura, will be seen in the leader that person accept. This is also for a society. A society chooses a leader that matches the frequency of the society.

If a society has an unseen trauma, the frequency of the society will be a bit lower. That means the leader will also have a lower frequency. Actually, (s)he will have a frequency that compatible to the most urgent trauma of the society.

As you can see in the picture, the frequency determines the norms and values of a society, as which choiches are been made. All toghether the frequency determines how individual people can live, how their lives are, how much freedom and health they have and how much opportunities their children will have.

Leaders make choices based on their traumas and experiences

What is important to know is that every single person makes choices on their traumas and experiences. As do leaders. If a leader is used to fight to protect himself, he will definitely make decisions that are build on being able to fight to protect the country. If a leader is used to be loved and to talk about problems, she will definitely choose negotiation and an open conversation to settle for peace for the country.

The traumas and experiences of a leader matter. And in our democracy we must be more carefull that we not only choose by frequency, but also check on knowledge, being well fit for the challenges and the outcome a society wants and needs.

Leaders use money to create new traumas

A traumatized leader normally accept only 'lesser' persons around him, especially when he's a male and traumatized some how in his dominance. And he also likes to create a society which he had known for a long time. That means, he will make decisions that lead the society to the trauma he has been through. It's not that this decisions are made by full knowledge and on purpose. It is how the Universe and the frequencies work, the natural law of attraction.

Leaders do have choices how they spend country's money. If the leader is traumatized it will spend the budget to the road that leads to his or her trauma. It will give the society a change to open up the trauma (for example to resist), to heal the trauma (peacefully move another way) or to adapt the trauma and continuing it to their children.

The choices of the society is one thing. But the more important thing is, if a leader invest money in his trauma, the frequency of the society will lower as a whole. This means that a society will live in more control, more fear, less chances and lower health. Eventually, a society can lock itself up and destroy itself.

Matriarchal Society As you can see in the picture, the Matriarchal Society is free of trauma. Most current traumas are based on the patriarch energy. The wars, the oppression, discrimination, etc. It's mostly male energy dominance. In a Matriarchal Society is the matriarch and patriarch energy balanced. This means the concepts of war, oppression and discrimation doesn't exist, only if the society will be attacked.

The key to a healthy society is trauma healing. Not only personal trauma healing, but also societal trauma healing. The is also to make someone with less traumas and a healthy mind in charge of the national budget and the political direction. If you want to live a healthy live, politics and economics matter.